Wednesday, February 18, 2026
9.9 C
Los Angeles

Jimmy Lai Sentenced to 20 Years Under Hong Kong’s National Security Law

Hong Kong media entrepreneur and pro-democracy advocate...

Former Chinese Justice Minister Sentenced to Life for $20 Million Bribery Scheme

Court finds Tang Yijun abused high office...

The philosophical puzzle of rational artificial intelligence

To what extent can an artificial system...

Chinese Court Convicts 21 in $307 Million Tether (USDT) Online Fraud and Casino Proceeds Case

CryptoChinese Court Convicts 21 in $307 Million Tether (USDT) Online Fraud and Casino Proceeds Case

A court in Tongliang, China, has convicted and sentenced 21 individuals for their involvement in transferring the proceeds of online fraud and illegal casinos from Tether (USDT) to Chinese Yuan (RMB), amounting to 2.25 billion RMB (approximately $307 million). Two key defendants, identified by their surnames Jiang and Zheng, recruited 19 other individuals to assist them in this operation. They employed a decentralized wallet called Bitpie, similar to Metamask, to convert USDT to RMB on virtual currency platforms through local peer-to-peer exchanges. The funds were then withdrawn in different cities across China, using false explanations like project payments and workers’ wages. Jiang profited approximately 22.62 million RMB (about $3 million) from these activities.

The court found the group guilty of disguising and concealing criminal proceeds, resulting in various prison sentences and fines. Jiang was sentenced to six years and three months in prison, along with a 500,000 RMB fine. Zheng received a similar sentence and fine.

While the court document doesn’t specify the origin of the USDT, it’s worth noting that Tether is a popular digital asset used by fraud rings operating in Southeast Asia. This case sheds light on the illicit use of cryptocurrencies like Tether in criminal activities, as highlighted in Bloomberg journalist Zeke Faux’s book “Number Go Up.”

By FCCT Editorial Team

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are independent views solely of the author(s) expressed in their private capacity.

Check out our other content

Ad


Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles