A Congressional Research Service update from March 19, 2026 confirms that FinCEN has yet to finalize several critical rulemakings required under the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), despite statutory deadlines having passed.
Among the delayed items is a final rule on the national AML/CFT priorities framework, which banks and financial institutions must incorporate into their risk-based compliance programs. FinCEN also remains behind on regulations covering antiquities dealers, a sector identified as a high-risk conduit for money laundering by transnational criminal organizations. The delays compound existing compliance uncertainty: financial institutions must align programs with national priorities that are not yet codified, leaving risk-based program development in a holding pattern.
From a compliance risk perspective, the absence of finalized guidance increases the likelihood of supervisory inconsistency — examiners from different agencies may apply varying interpretations of what constitutes an ‘effective’ AML program. There is also a whistleblower dimension: FinCEN launched a dedicated webpage in February 2026 to confidentially accept tips on money laundering and sanctions violations, signalling that tip-driven enforcement may fill enforcement gaps where formal rulemaking has lagged. Compliance officers should treat the rulemaking delay not as a reprieve but as a period of elevated supervisory risk, during which robust documentation of reasonable, good-faith program design choices will be essential.
By FCCT Editorial Team

