Thursday, August 28, 2025
20.9 C
Los Angeles

AUSTRAC orders audit of global crypto exchange

AUSTRAC has directed Binance Australia to appoint...

Sanctions Notice – Iran

Please be advised that the following individuals/entities...

Man Sentenced for Over $11M COVID-19 Relief Fraud and Money Laundering Scheme

A Nevada man was sentenced today to...

Singapore: Enhanced anti-money laundering regime for companies, foreign companies and limited liability partnerships

Money LaunderingSingapore: Enhanced anti-money laundering regime for companies, foreign companies and limited liability partnerships

The Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024 enhances disclosures of beneficial owenrship of corporate entities and prevents abuse of nominee arrangemens to strengthen Singapore’s anti-money laundering regime.

In brief

The Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024 amended, from 16 June 2025, the Companies Act 1967 (CA) and the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005 along with related regulations, to address the risk of misuse of nominee arrangements — an area identified as vulnerable to abuse and potentially the cause of illicit activities.

These amendments enhance Singapore’s anti-money laundering regime to:

Align disclosure requirements in the statutory registers of controllers, nominee directors and shareholders with the latest Financial Action Task Force standards

Prevent relevant individuals from being inadvertently excluded from required disclosures

Increase transparency of nominee arrangements and ensure timeliness of disclosure and that the disclosed information continues to be kept accurate and updated.

These measures complement the Corporate Service Providers Act 2024 and the Corporate Service Providers Regulations 2025 (“CSP Regulations“), which, from 9 June 2025, also amended the CA. Together with the CSP Regulations, they prohibit individuals from acting as nominee directors by way of business unless the arrangement is made through a corporate service provider and the individuals meet the fit and proper requirements (see our Alert: Custodial sentencing for professional directors’ breach of statutory duty of reasonable diligence).

We set out below a summary of the changes, the required compliance with the enhanced standards, and the new timelines and penalties.

Click here to read the full alert.

* * * * *

© 2025 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “principal” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Story from www.globalcompliancenews.com

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are independent views solely of the author(s) expressed in their private capacity.

Check out our other content

Ad


Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles