Tuesday, December 3, 2024
12.2 C
Los Angeles

FATF Monitoring: Countries Addressing Strategic Deficiencies

Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring by the FATF Countries...

Former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo Sentenced to 20+ Years in Odebrecht Bribery Scandal

Former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo has been...

Ex-Mexican Security Chief Sentenced for Bribery and Aiding Sinaloa Cartel’s Drug Trafficking

Genaro Garcia Luna, Mexico's former Secretary of...

How Gen AI governance framework can help build trust in tomorrow’s tech

AI/MLHow Gen AI governance framework can help build trust in tomorrow’s tech

Understanding the trust quotient in generative AI

To capitalize on the competitive advantage and drive business value offered by Generative AI, it is imperative for enterprises to build trust in Generative AI models and solutions. This can be achieved by ensuring AI transparency, AI accountability, and ethical considerations in AI development are integral components of the Generative AI design itself.

Organizations need to establish clear lines of responsibility for actions and outputs generated, develop auditable and monitorable mechanisms for traceability, and facilitate the identification of errors, biases, or misconduct within Generative AI. Further, AI ethics must be intentionally integrated into the fabric of Generative AI design through development of technological processes to manage key ethical aspects such as bias mitigation, privacy protection, consent autonomy, social impact, responsible AI data usage, human oversight, etc.

Evaluating the efficacy of governance mechanisms in trust-building

To build and sustain trust in AI, organizations need to establish a Generative AI Governance framework that is unbiased, resilient, explainable, transparent and performance-based. Enterprises must ensure that inherent biases are identified and managed, and that the data used by the Generative AI system, its components, and the algorithm itself are secured from unauthorized access, corruption, and adversarial attack. The training methods and decisions criteria of Generative AI should be understood, documented and readily available for human operator challenge and validation, where necessary.

Privacy-related initiatives, such as providing end-users with appropriate notification during AI interaction, offering an opportunity to select their level of interaction, and obtaining user consent for related data processing, need to be clearly defined. It is crucial to ensure that the conformance of these initiatives is integral to the implementation process.

From a business standpoint, it is essential to ensure that the outcomes of Generative AI align with stakeholders’ expectations, and performance is monitored to adhere to the desired level of precision and consistency.

Steering regulatory dynamics forward

While commendable efforts are being made across the global landscape to rapidly develop and update Generative AI regulations and guidance, the pace of Generative AI innovation is too exponential for current global initiatives to adequately rein in the technology and its usage. There is an ardent need for enterprises to actively track these Generative AI regulations and ensure compliance with necessary requirements.

Story from www.ey.com

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are independent views solely of the author(s) expressed in their private capacity.

Check out our other content

Ad


Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles