The UK Parliament has approved the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2026, introducing a package of 15 targeted reforms aimed at strengthening the country’s anti-money laundering (AML) framework while reducing unnecessary compliance obligations for regulated firms. The amendments came into force on 30 June 2026, marking one of the most significant updates to the UK’s AML regime in recent years.
The reforms follow the Government’s 2024 review of the UK’s anti-money laundering framework, which identified areas where regulations could be made more effective, proportionate, and better aligned with evolving financial crime risks. Policymakers have positioned the changes as a move toward a more risk-based and outcomes-focused supervisory approach, balancing the need for robust financial crime controls with the operational realities faced by businesses.
The latest amendments are expected to affect a broad range of regulated entities, including banks, financial institutions, professional service providers, trust and company service providers (TCSPs), and cryptoasset firms.
Shift Toward a More Targeted Risk-Based Approach
A key feature of the reforms is the revision of enhanced due diligence (EDD) requirements relating to high-risk jurisdictions.
Under the previous framework, firms were required to apply mandatory EDD measures when dealing with customers or transactions connected to countries appearing on either of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)’s high-risk jurisdiction lists—the so-called “black list” of countries subject to a call for action and the “grey list” of countries under increased monitoring.
The amended regulations narrow this requirement significantly. Going forward, mandatory EDD will apply only to jurisdictions appearing on the FATF black list. Firms will no longer be automatically required to apply enhanced due diligence solely because a country appears on the FATF grey list.
Government officials argue that this change reflects the dynamic nature of the grey list, which is updated frequently as jurisdictions improve or address deficiencies in their AML controls. By removing automatic EDD obligations for grey-listed countries, regulated entities will be given greater flexibility to assess risks based on the specific circumstances of individual customers, transactions, and business relationships.
The reform is expected to reduce administrative burdens while preserving firms’ ability to apply enhanced scrutiny where risks justify additional controls.
Clarification on Complex and Large Transactions
The amendments also address a long-standing area of uncertainty surrounding the treatment of complex and large transactions.
Previously, the regulations required enhanced due diligence for transactions that were described as “complex or unusually large.” Industry participants and compliance professionals had raised concerns that the wording could be interpreted too broadly, resulting in excessive or inconsistent application of enhanced checks.
Under the revised regulations, the requirement has been clarified to apply to transactions that are “unusually complex or unusually large” in the context of the particular customer, business relationship, or transaction.
The adjustment is intended to provide greater regulatory certainty and encourage firms to focus investigative resources on genuinely suspicious activity rather than applying enhanced controls to routine transactions that merely happen to be large in value.
Regulators believe the clarification will support a more intelligence-led approach to risk assessment while helping compliance teams avoid overly cautious interpretations that can increase costs without improving financial crime detection.
Simplified Compliance Through Sterling-Based Thresholds
Another practical change introduced by the reforms involves the replacement of several euro-denominated thresholds with equivalent values expressed directly in pounds sterling.
Historically, certain AML obligations were triggered by thresholds set in euros, requiring firms to calculate exchange rates and determine sterling equivalents when assessing compliance obligations.
The new regulations simplify this process by adopting fixed pound sterling thresholds. For example, the existing €10,000 threshold used in certain customer due diligence scenarios will now be replaced by a straightforward £10,000 threshold.
The change is expected to improve operational efficiency, reduce administrative complexity, and provide greater certainty for firms applying AML controls on a day-to-day basis.
Industry stakeholders have generally welcomed the move as a practical adjustment that eliminates unnecessary calculations without materially affecting risk management outcomes.
Closing Regulatory Loopholes in Corporate Services
The amendment package also addresses perceived gaps in the regulation of trust and company service providers.
Under the updated rules, the sale of off-the-shelf companies is explicitly brought within the scope of AML regulations applicable to TCSPs. As a result, providers engaged in such activities will be required to conduct customer due diligence and comply with relevant AML obligations in the same way as they do for other regulated services.
The Government has stated that this clarification is intended to ensure consistent regulatory treatment across all TCSP activities and prevent potential misuse of company formation services by individuals seeking to obscure ownership structures or facilitate illicit financial activity.
By removing ambiguity regarding the scope of regulated services, policymakers hope to strengthen transparency and reduce opportunities for abuse within corporate structures.
Implications for Cryptoasset Firms and Information Sharing
Beyond the headline reforms, the amendment package includes additional measures affecting cryptoasset businesses and information-sharing arrangements among regulated entities and supervisory authorities.
The changes are designed to ensure that the UK’s AML framework remains responsive to emerging risks associated with digital assets while maintaining alignment with international standards established by the FATF and other global bodies.
Expanded information-sharing powers are also expected to improve collaboration between firms and authorities, supporting more effective identification and disruption of money laundering and terrorist financing activity.
Balancing Effectiveness and Proportionality
Government ministers have emphasized that the reforms are intended to strike a balance between maintaining strong safeguards against financial crime and ensuring that compliance requirements remain proportionate to the risks involved.
The amendments reflect a broader policy shift toward risk-based supervision, where firms are encouraged to focus resources on higher-risk activities rather than applying blanket controls across all scenarios.
Supporters of the reforms argue that reducing unnecessary compliance obligations will allow regulated entities to dedicate greater attention to genuinely suspicious activity, improving both efficiency and effectiveness.
At the same time, the Government maintains that the changes preserve the integrity of the UK’s AML regime and reinforce its commitment to international financial crime standards.
As the amendments take effect, regulated firms across the financial and professional services sectors are expected to review internal policies, risk assessment frameworks, customer due diligence procedures, and transaction monitoring practices to ensure compliance with the updated requirements.
The reforms represent a significant evolution of the UK’s AML framework, signaling a move toward a more targeted, flexible, and risk-sensitive approach to combating money laundering and terrorist financing in an increasingly complex financial landscape.
By FCCT Editorial Team

